Witness for the Prosecution (1957) | |
Plot Synopsis (continued)
Preparations for the Trial - Details About Leonard's and Christine's Past: Before the trial opened, Leonard had been held in jail for two weeks. When visited by Mr. Mayhew and Wilfrid, a grateful Leonard thanked Wilfrid for representing him. The ailing barrister claimed that his doctors had agreed to let him work on the case, but were planning to exile him to Bermuda once it was over. A photograph was taken of Leonard with the overcoat he had worn the night of the murder. Upset and on the verge of breaking down, Leonard asked why Christine hadn't visited him in jail. Wilfrid read the report of the testimony of Janet MacKenzie, Mrs. French's housekeeper, who claimed that Vole helped Mrs. French with her business affairs, including her complicated income tax returns, and presumably advised her to revise her will. Leonard denied helping her: ("If Janet said that, she's lying. She was always against me, I don't know why!"). Leonard also admitted to cutting his wrist while slicing bread with a knife two days after the murder - an incident witnessed by Christine. The conversation turned to how Christine and Leonard had met in the past - seen in flashback:
After Leonard's lengthy version of his earliest acquaintance with Christine, Wilfrid insisted he wouldn't put Christine on the witness box to testify, arguing that English as her second-language might be a weakness: "The prosecution could easily trip her up." Before being taken away, Leonard reacted with fear and begged for Wilfrid to allow her to provide exculpatory evidence: ("I can't face this without Christine. I tell you, I'm scared. I need her. Without her, I'm sunk"). Wilfrid thought that Leonard's pleas were desperate: "Like a drowning man clutching at a razor blade." The Opening of the Trial in Old Bailey: As the trial opened, Leonard pleaded "NOT GUILTY" to the charge of murdering 56 year-old Emily Jane French on the 14th day of October in the county of London, between 9:30-10:00 pm "by a blow from a blunt and heavy instrument." The Crown's prosecution team was led by Mr. Myers (Torin Thatcher), and the defence was to be conducted by Sir Wilfrid and Brogan-Moore, although Sir Wilfrid had missed the opening moments due to being incapacitated with an attending doctor. He was suffering from high blood pressure and was being prescribed regular medications (nitroglycerine tablets) and calcium injections daily. He was allowed to bring in a flask of cocoa - at the last minute switched by Carter for one filled with brandy, to hide it from Miss Plimsoll who sat in the spectator's gallery. A series of witnesses were to be called:
Once Sir Wilfrid arrived, he objected to some of the "opinions" and "leading questions" rather than facts being postulated by Mr. Myers during Hearne's testimony. According to Hearne, a single blow to the head caused instantaneous death, somewhere between 9:30 and 10:00 pm. The fingerprints of Mrs. French, Janet MacKenzie and Leonard Vole were found. The room had the appearance that a robbery had occurred, although nothing was missing. The jacket found in Leonard's flat, after testing for bloodstains, confirmed human bloodstains (with Type O blood, Mrs. French's blood-type) that were attempted to be washed out. When Wilfrid cross-examined the witness, he caused some doubt by mentioning that a robber might have worn gloves. He also stated how the bloodstains may have come from Leonard himself (also with Type O blood), who had testified earlier - with his wife as a witness, that he had cut his wrist with a razor-sharp knife while slicing bread in his own household. During Janet MacKenzie's testimony, she said that she had been the companion-housekeeper for the deceased Mrs. French for the previous 10 years, but now was forced to live with her niece, only a five minute walk away from the French residence. On her night off, the fateful October 14th, she left the house at 7:30 pm, but then slipped back into the house to retrieve a dress pattern at 9:25 pm in her upstairs room. She claimed that she heard Leonard and Mrs. French "talkin' and laughin'" in the sitting room. Then after returning to her niece's place for a few hours, she arrived back at around 10:40 pm and discovered the dead Mrs. French. Conjectures by Janet about Mrs. French's knowledge of Leonard's marriage were not allowed. However, the most damning evidence was presented when she affirmed that she had also overheard Mrs. French call her solicitor Mr. Stokes to have "her old will revoked and a new one drawn up," while Leonard was present. According to her, on October 8th, she had heard them discussing the revised will: "He was to have all her money, she told him, as she had no near relations nor anybody that meant to her what he did." During cross-examination, Sir Wilfrid was able to have Janet admit that she had been Mrs. French’s major beneficiary: ("the bulk of Mrs. French's estate") in the previous will. But once it was revoked, her bequest was reduced to "a small annuity," while Leonard became the "principal beneficiary." Sir Wilfried thus established that Janet's "antagonistic" attitude toward the "prisoner" was understandable. Janet even called Leonard a "shiftless, schemin' rascal." In addition, Sir Wilfrid also established that when she was eavesdropping on their conversation through the closed, thick solid-oak sitting room door, that due to her ongoing hearing problems (and order for a hearing aid that she had not yet received), it would have been difficult for her to positively identify Leonard's voice. In fact, Mrs. French might have been watching TV as she often did in the evenings, although Janet claimed the TV was away for repairs that week. The "Surprise Witness" Testimony for the Prosecution by Leonard's Own 'Wife' - Christine Helm: On the third day of the trial, Sir Wilfrid was completely stunned when Christine Helm was called to the stand by the prosecution as a "surprise witness" - their final witness. Although she couldn't be called to testify on behalf of her husband to defend him, now she had agreed to provide evidence against her 'husband' Leonard Vole. She had become a "witness for the prosecution" to damningly testify against him and cold-heartedly betray her "husband." On the stand:
Leonard broke down twice during the damning testimony and tried to counteract Christine's allegations: "Christine, what are you saying? It's not true. You know it's not true!...Christine! Why are you lying? Why are you saying these things?" Now, she vowed that she had to tell the truth about Leonard's guilt: "I cannot go on lying to save him." She also firmly stated: "I never loved him." Christine made a final statement about how she wanted to be truthful, and not be made an "accomplice to murder":
When cross-examined by Sir Wilfrid, he accused her of committing perjury for much of her life. She was not even a credible witness for the prosecution, and he clearly was able to establish her life-long pattern of deceptive lying:
One of the film's most memorable moments was Sir Wilfrid's outburst at Christine for her habitual perjuring:
Christine was summarily dismissed by Sir Wilfrid from the stand: "I doubt if anything is to be gained by questioning you any further. That will be all, Frau Helm." However, he asked that her testimony be considered as a prosecution witness, even though she was completely unreliable:
Sir Wilfrid's Defense - Leonard Vole on the Witness Stand: With only circumstantial evidence presented through testimony from the various witnesses, Sir Wilfrid decided to only briefly call Leonard to speak on his own behalf. He asked just one crucial question: "Leonard Stephen Vole, did you or did you not on the night of October the 14th last, murder Emily Jane French?" When Leonard denied being the murderer, Sir Wilfrid ended his examination with this conclusion:
However, Mr. Meyer proceeded with a detailed, harsh cross-examination of Leonard, and was able to uncover some new incriminating implications:
Reviewing the Case: That evening, Sir Wilfrid was with Mr. Mayhew and Brogan-Moore discussing the day's testimony of the two main witnesses in his office-study. Brogan-Moore thought it would be over soon: "It seems too open-and-shut." Wilfrid observed: "I watched them when Frau Helm was on the stand. They didn't like her." However, Brogan-Moore disagreed: "No, they didn't like her, but they believed her. They liked Leonard Vole but they didn't believe him." Brogan-Moore was unsure whether Christine had lied or not, but Sir Wilfrid was certain she had - but wondered why:
|